R v Feroz; R v Ho; R v Hoang; R v Nguyen; R v Trinh [2020] NSWSC 341

R v Feroz; R v Ho; R v Hoang; R v Nguyen; R v Trinh [2020] NSWSC 341

Each offender was sentenced based on their role and level of participation in the joint criminal enterprise resulting in Mr Luong's death, individual aggravating/mitigating factors, and criminal record. Murder sentences were imposed on Tony William Ho (20 years, 15-year non-parole) and Sinh Jason Hoang (22 years, 16.5-year non-parole) due to intention to inflict grievous bodily harm, use of a knife, and leadership or direct violence. Manslaughter sentences (9 years for Abdul Feroz and Vuong Van Nguyen, 9 years with 6 years 9 months non-parole for Minh Duc Trinh) reflected their lesser but still serious roles, lack of intention or knowledge about the knife, and degree of culpability....

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdicts
Outcome
All five accused sentenced to imprisonment for murder or manslaughter as per verdicts; additional concurrent imprisonment for related weapons/firearms offences. Orders as specified.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'manslaughter' 'sentencing' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'drug Offences' 'weapons Offences' 'parity' 'objective and Subjective Criminality']
['criminal Law'] ['murder' 'manslaughter' 'sentencing' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'drug Offences' 'weapons Offences' 'parity' 'objective and Subjective Criminality']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdicts

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate sentences for offenders convicted of murder and manslaughter arising from a fatal attack over a drug debt; application of parity principle; assessment of aggravating and mitigating circumstances; objective vs subjective criminality of each offender; whether sentences for additional weapons/firearms offences should be concurrent or cumulative; special circumstances for non-parole periods.']

Ratio Decidendi

Each offender was sentenced based on their role and level of participation in the joint criminal enterprise resulting in Mr Luong's death, individual aggravating/mitigating factors, and criminal record. Murder sentences were imposed on Tony William Ho (20 years, 15-year non-parole) and Sinh Jason Hoang (22 years, 16.5-year non-parole) due to intention to inflict grievous bodily harm, use of a knife, and leadership or direct violence. Manslaughter sentences (9 years for Abdul Feroz and Vuong Van Nguyen, 9 years with 6 years 9 months non-parole for Minh Duc Trinh) reflected their lesser but still serious roles, lack of intention or knowledge about the knife, and degree of culpability....

Court Disposition

All five accused sentenced to imprisonment for murder or manslaughter as per verdicts; additional concurrent imprisonment for related weapons/firearms offences. Orders as specified.

Orders

  • ['Abdul Feroz sentenced to 9 years imprisonment (6 years non-parole) for manslaughter, with 12 months concurrent for various weapons offences; eligible for parole after 6 years.' 'Tony William Ho sentenced to 20 years imprisonment (15 years non-parole) for murder, with 3 months concurrent for possession of...