R v O’Keefe [2015] NSWSC 89
The accused was suffering from a major depressive illness with psychotic symptoms, which constituted a disease of the mind, resulting in a defect of reason such that at the time of the act he did not appreciate the moral wrongfulness of his actions. The defence of mental illness was made out on the balance of probabilities, and thus a special verdict of not guilty on the ground of mental illness was returned.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial by Judge Alone, Delivery of Judgment
- Outcome
- Not guilty on the ground of mental illness
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'mental Illness Defence' 'affirmative Defence' 'psychiatric Evidence' 'trial by Judge Alone']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial by Judge Alone, Delivery of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the accused, Bruce Francis O'Keefe, is not guilty of murder on the ground of mental illness"]
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was suffering from a major depressive illness with psychotic symptoms, which constituted a disease of the mind, resulting in a defect of reason such that at the time of the act he did not appreciate the moral wrongfulness of his actions. The defence of mental illness was made out on the balance of probabilities, and thus a special verdict of not guilty on the ground of mental illness was returned.
Court Disposition
Not guilty on the ground of mental illness
Orders
- ["Special verdict that the accused, Bruce Francis O'Keefe, is not guilty on the ground of mental illness." 'The accused is to be detained at the Hamden Unit of the Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre at Silverwater, or at such other place as may be determined from time to time by the Mental Health Review...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment