R v Papanicolaou (No 5) [2022] NSWSC 28

R v Papanicolaou (No 5) [2022] NSWSC 28

The juror was discharged under s 53B(b) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) due to a reasonable apprehension of bias, and the whole jury was discharged under s 53C(1)(a), as continuing with the remaining jurors would have created the risk of a substantial miscarriage of justice, particularly given the risk that the juror's distress could have influenced other jurors and the serious nature of the charge.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial (jury Selection/discharge)
Outcome
Jury and individual juror discharged
Legal Topics
['murder' 'partial Defences' 'substantial Impairment' 'jury Discharge' 'procedural Ruling']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial (jury Selection/discharge)

  1. 1 ['Whether a juror should be discharged under s 53B(b) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) due to reasonable apprehension of bias' 'Whether the whole jury should be discharged under s 53C(1)(a) due to the risk of a substantial miscarriage of justice']

Ratio Decidendi

The juror was discharged under s 53B(b) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) due to a reasonable apprehension of bias, and the whole jury was discharged under s 53C(1)(a), as continuing with the remaining jurors would have created the risk of a substantial miscarriage of justice, particularly given the risk that the juror's distress could have influenced other jurors and the serious nature of the charge.

Court Disposition

Jury and individual juror discharged

Orders

  • ['Under s 53B(b) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) the juror who provided the note marked MFI 3 is discharged.' 'Under s 53C(1)(a) of the Jury Act the jury is discharged.']