R v Fang (No. 4) [2017] NSWSC 323
The sentence reflects the principle that self-induced intoxication by a prohibited drug such as Ice does not mitigate the seriousness of the offence or reduce the offender's culpability for murder. While remorse, facilitation of justice, and good prospects of rehabilitation were favourable to the offender, the frenzied nature of the knife attack, with 20 stab wounds inflicted under the influence of Ice, placed the offence in the mid-range of objective seriousness. The standard non-parole period was adjusted to reflect special circumstances, but a significant custodial sentence was imposed to serve the purposes of punishment, denunciation, and general deterrence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction at Trial
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'sentencing' 'self Induced Intoxication' 'drug Induced Psychosis' 'remorse' 'facilitation of Justice' 'objective Seriousness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Relevance of self-induced intoxication and drug induced psychosis in sentencing for murder' "Whether offender's contrition and facilitation of justice affect sentence" 'Objective seriousness and appropriate length of custodial sentence for murder involving 20 stab wounds']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence reflects the principle that self-induced intoxication by a prohibited drug such as Ice does not mitigate the seriousness of the offence or reduce the offender's culpability for murder. While remorse, facilitation of justice, and good prospects of rehabilitation were favourable to the offender, the frenzied nature of the knife attack, with 20 stab wounds inflicted under the influence of Ice, placed the offence in the mid-range of objective seriousness. The standard non-parole period was adjusted to reflect special circumstances, but a significant custodial sentence was imposed to serve the purposes of punishment, denunciation, and general deterrence.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 19 years, comprising a non-parole period of 14 years (from 4 October 2014 to 3 October 2028) and a balance of term of 5 years (from 4 October 2028 to 3 October 2033).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment