R v Blackman (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 405
The Crown case was incapable of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the perpetrator, as substantial probative evidence pointed away from the accused and towards another person. Accordingly, the Prasad invitation was accepted and verdicts of not guilty returned.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Special Hearing Judge Alone
- Outcome
- accused acquitted of all counts
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'manslaughter' 'infliction of Grievous Bodily Harm' 'prasad Invitation' 'special Hearing' 'unfitness to Stand Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Hearing Judge Alone
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the evidence is sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the perpetrator of the assault(s) that caused the deceased’s death' 'Whether the Crown case can exclude rational alternative hypotheses consistent with innocence']
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown case was incapable of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the perpetrator, as substantial probative evidence pointed away from the accused and towards another person. Accordingly, the Prasad invitation was accepted and verdicts of not guilty returned.
Court Disposition
accused acquitted of all counts
Orders
- ['Verdicts of not guilty for murder, manslaughter, and inflicting grievous bodily harm with intent' 'Accused discharged upon the indictment' 'Accused immediately released']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment