R v Graf [2019] NSWSC 1767

R v Graf [2019] NSWSC 1767

James Graf is currently unfit to stand trial because, although aware of the charge, his capacity to plead, understand alternatives, challenge jurors, follow proceedings, comprehend evidence, and instruct legal representatives is severely compromised by acute symptoms of schizophrenia, as attested unanimously by three psychiatrists.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Fitness to Stand Trial Inquiry
Outcome
Accused found unfit to be tried; matter referred to Mental Health Review Tribunal; accused remanded in custody pending determination.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'fitness to Stand Trial' 'schizophrenia' 'presser Test']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Fitness to Stand Trial Inquiry

  1. 1 ['Whether James Graf is fit to stand trial for murder under the Presser criteria.']

Ratio Decidendi

James Graf is currently unfit to stand trial because, although aware of the charge, his capacity to plead, understand alternatives, challenge jurors, follow proceedings, comprehend evidence, and instruct legal representatives is severely compromised by acute symptoms of schizophrenia, as attested unanimously by three psychiatrists.

Court Disposition

Accused found unfit to be tried; matter referred to Mental Health Review Tribunal; accused remanded in custody pending determination.

Orders

  • ['The accused is unfit to be tried.' 'In accordance with s 14(a) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, the matter is referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal.' 'In accordance with s 14(b)(iii) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, the accused is remanded in custody until the...