R v Villalon [2014] NSWSC 727
The law requires the trial judge to leave provocation to the jury if there is material raising it, regardless of the tactical decisions of counsel. In this case, as there is abundant evidence of provocation, it must be left to the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Jury Trial Ruling on Whether Provocation Should Be Left to Jury
- Outcome
- Provocation left to the jury
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'provocation' 'jury Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Jury Trial Ruling on Whether Provocation Should Be Left to Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether provocation should be left to the jury in a murder trial' 'Whether there is evidence capable of constituting provocation']
Ratio Decidendi
The law requires the trial judge to leave provocation to the jury if there is material raising it, regardless of the tactical decisions of counsel. In this case, as there is abundant evidence of provocation, it must be left to the jury.
Court Disposition
Provocation left to the jury
Orders
- ['Provocation to be considered by the jury during the murder trial']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment