R v Dean Jones [2010] NSWSC 432
The offence falls a little below the mid-range of seriousness for murder because the intent was not to kill but to cause serious injury, the attack was unplanned and in response to slight provocation, Methadone toxicity contributed to death, and a late guilty plea was entered. The Court fixed a non-parole period of 16 years and a total sentence of 21 years and 4 months.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Offender: Dean Jones
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for murder with a non-parole period of 16 years and a balance of 5 years and 4 months.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Non Parole Period, Drug Use, Provocation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Dean Jones
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for murder
- 2 Effect of guilty plea on sentencing
- 3 Role of provocation and intoxication in mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The offence falls a little below the mid-range of seriousness for murder because the intent was not to kill but to cause serious injury, the attack was unplanned and in response to slight provocation, Methadone toxicity contributed to death, and a late guilty plea was entered. The Court fixed a non-parole period of 16 years and a total sentence of 21 years and 4 months.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to imprisonment for murder with a non-parole period of 16 years and a balance of 5 years and 4 months.
Orders
- Set a non-parole period of 16 years, commencing on 20 June 2008 and expiring on 19 June 2024.
- Balance of the term is 5 years and 4 months, expiring on 19 October 2029.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment