Regina v Stone [2004] NSWSC 224
Appropriate sentence is determined by reference to the sentencing pattern as it existed in 1990, taking into account the seriousness and circumstances of the offence, aggravating and mitigating factors, evidence of remorse, and utilitarian value of the guilty plea. The prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-one years with a non parole period of fifteen years nine months.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Peter John Stone
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Guilty Plea, Mitigation, Aggravating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Peter John Stone
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Assessment of sentence for murder committed in 1990
- 2 Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors
- 3 Effect of delay and change in sentencing regime
Ratio Decidendi
Appropriate sentence is determined by reference to the sentencing pattern as it existed in 1990, taking into account the seriousness and circumstances of the offence, aggravating and mitigating factors, evidence of remorse, and utilitarian value of the guilty plea. The prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-one years with a non parole period of fifteen years nine months.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Peter John Stone is sentenced to imprisonment for twenty one years to date from 21 January 2003.
- A non parole period of fifteen years nine months to commence on 21 January 2003 and to expire on 20 October 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment