Murex Diagnostics Australia Pty Ltd v Chiron Corporation & Ors [1995] FCA 1095
The prejudice to the Murex companies from delay and continued exposure to accumulating potential damages outweighs the difficulties Chiron may face owing to Mr Blackburn's inability to be physically present throughout the hearing; alternatives exist for communication during the period of absence.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory (application for Adjournment of Hearing Date)
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'prejudice to Parties' 'case Management']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory (application for Adjournment of Hearing Date)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing date should be adjourned due to the unavailability of a key person for the respondent (Mr Blackburn)']
Ratio Decidendi
The prejudice to the Murex companies from delay and continued exposure to accumulating potential damages outweighs the difficulties Chiron may face owing to Mr Blackburn's inability to be physically present throughout the hearing; alternatives exist for communication during the period of absence.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused
Orders
- ['The hearing date is not to be varied.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment