SKIMMINGS v SAVINS & SAVINS (No 2) [2007] NSWDC 176
There is no basis to deny the plaintiff an order for indemnity costs as the assessment of damages did not rely on material served after the offer of compromise; damages were based on credible medical evidence existing before the offer.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Orders
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['offer of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs' 'future Domestic Assistance' 'assessment of Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be ordered based on an offer of compromise' 'Assessment of damages including domestic assistance' 'Calculation of life expectancy for damages purposes']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no basis to deny the plaintiff an order for indemnity costs as the assessment of damages did not rely on material served after the offer of compromise; damages were based on credible medical evidence existing before the offer.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- ['Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $397,771.19.' "Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis up to 29 May 2007 and on an indemnity basis from that date." 'Orders stayed subject to defendants filing and serving within 28 days a notice of appeal.' 'Exhibits to be retained until further order.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment