Karim v R; Magaming v R; Bin Lahaiya v R; Bayu v R; Alomalu v R (No 2) [2013] NSWCCA 43

Karim v R; Magaming v R; Bin Lahaiya v R; Bayu v R; Alomalu v R (No 2) [2013] NSWCCA 43

No amendment is necessary to the record of orders regarding the Human Rights Commission's participation; the Commission was not a party but acted as amicus. Proposed changes to reasons are inappropriate.

Parties
Appellant: Mursid Karim; Appellant: Bimbi Yusuf Bin Lahaiya; Appellant: Bayu Bayu (aka Ilham Dahlan); Applicant: Sakarias Alomalu; Respondent: The Queen; Magaming
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consequential Orders Following Substantive Judgment
Outcome
Notice of motion filed 22 February 2013 dismissed.
Legal Topics
Consequential Orders, Amicus Curiae, Intervention
Criminal Law Practice and Procedure Consequential Orders Amicus Curiae Intervention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mursid Karim

Appellant

Bimbi Yusuf Bin Lahaiya

Appellant

Bayu Bayu (aka Ilham Dahlan)

Appellant

Sakarias Alomalu

Applicant

The Queen

Respondent

Magaming

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Consequential Orders Following Substantive Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the record of orders should be amended relating to the Human Rights Commission's participation
  2. 2 Appropriateness of changes to reasons provided by Allsop P

Ratio Decidendi

No amendment is necessary to the record of orders regarding the Human Rights Commission's participation; the Commission was not a party but acted as amicus. Proposed changes to reasons are inappropriate.

Court Disposition

Notice of motion filed 22 February 2013 dismissed.

Orders

  • The notice of motion filed 22 February 2013 is dismissed.