Muscat Developments Pty Ltd (formerly known as Muscat Hydroponics Pty Ltd) and ors v Wollondilly Shire Council Muscat Developments Pty Ltd (trading as Muscat Developments Pty Ltd) v Wollondilly Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1681
The proposed modification, following additional information and expert reports addressing all concerns, qualifies as substantially the same development as previously approved. No outstanding contentions remain and modification consent is granted; building certificate is refused.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Muscat Developments Pty Ltd (formerly known as Muscat Hydroponics Pty Ltd); Second Applicant: James Muscat; Second Applicant: Catherine Mary Muscat; Applicant: Muscat Developments Pty Ltd (trading as Muscat Developments Pty Ltd); Respondent: Wollondilly Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- The modification appeal is upheld; the application to modify consent is approved subject to conditions. The building certificate appeal is dismissed and the application for building certificate refused.
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Development Consent, Building Certificate, Intensive Livestock Agriculture, Poultry Broiler Farming
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muscat Developments Pty Ltd (formerly known as Muscat Hydroponics Pty Ltd)
First Applicant
James Muscat
Second Applicant
Catherine Mary Muscat
Second Applicant
Muscat Developments Pty Ltd (trading as Muscat Developments Pty Ltd)
Applicant
Wollondilly Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed modification is substantially the same development as that originally approved
- 2 Whether sufficient information is provided regarding conservation area, watercourse proximity, impacts on flora and fauna, odour, noise, traffic, contamination, and heritage
- 3 Whether building certificate should be issued for structures associated with raising chickens
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification, following additional information and expert reports addressing all concerns, qualifies as substantially the same development as previously approved. No outstanding contentions remain and modification consent is granted; building certificate is refused.
Court Disposition
The modification appeal is upheld; the application to modify consent is approved subject to conditions. The building certificate appeal is dismissed and the application for building certificate refused.
Orders
- Appeal No.16/386136: The appeal is upheld.
- Appeal No.16/386136: Application to modify DA 1Q.2012.125.001 for construction of Intensive Livestock Agriculture - Poultry (Broiler) Farm at 440 Cawdor Road, Cawdor is approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment