Ibrahim, Mustafa v Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 802

Ibrahim, Mustafa v Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 802

The applicant did not establish any reviewable error in the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal was entitled on the evidence to find that the applicant was not in hiding in Jakarta, that the Indonesian authorities had not shown a current interest in him outside Aceh, and that efforts against Aceh Merdeka supporters were restricted to Aceh and surrounding areas. Given the finding that the applicant could safely and reasonably reside in Jakarta, the Tribunal did not err in concluding that he had no well-founded fear of persecution in Indonesia as a whole.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order of Review Under Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Federal Court Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'aceh Merdeka' 'indonesia' 'internal Flight Principle' 'judicial Review Under Migration Act 1958 (cth) Ss 475 and 476']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for an Order of Review Under Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Federal Court Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself by requiring evidence of Indonesian authorities' interest in the applicant while he lived in Jakarta" "Whether the Tribunal made a reviewable error in finding that the applicant's claim to have been hiding in Jakarta was a recent invention" "Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the applicant's evidence about persecution of Aceh Merdeka members outside Aceh" 'Whether the Tribunal incorrectly applied the internal flight principle where the feared persecution was said to be by State authorities']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not establish any reviewable error in the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal was entitled on the evidence to find that the applicant was not in hiding in Jakarta, that the Indonesian authorities had not shown a current interest in him outside Aceh, and that efforts against Aceh Merdeka supporters were restricted to Aceh and surrounding areas. Given the finding that the applicant could safely and reasonably reside in Jakarta, the Tribunal did not err in concluding that he had no well-founded fear of persecution in Indonesia as a whole.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings"]