Syed v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 498
The application for extension of time was refused because the proposed grounds of appeal lacked any self-evident merit and failed to identify appellable errors in the preceding decisions. The discretion to grant an extension was not exercised as the grounds had no sufficient prospect of success.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mustafa Syed; First Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time refused; proceeding dismissed; applicant to pay costs of the First Respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Refusal of Adjournment, Partner Visa, Federal Court Appeal Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mustafa Syed
Applicant
Minister for Home Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the grounds of appeal have sufficient merit to warrant extension
- 3 Whether the refusal to adjourn by the primary judge was in error
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time was refused because the proposed grounds of appeal lacked any self-evident merit and failed to identify appellable errors in the preceding decisions. The discretion to grant an extension was not exercised as the grounds had no sufficient prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time refused; proceeding dismissed; applicant to pay costs of the First Respondent.
Orders
- The name of the First Respondent be changed to the Minister for Home Affairs.
- The Application for an extension of time is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment