Kennett & Anor v Mayrana Pty Ltd and Others (No 2) [2006] NSWIRComm 264
There is no reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the judge arising solely from prior participation in appellate proceedings refusing leave to appeal, where the basis for refusal was the lack of public interest and no adverse finding was made as to the applicants' conduct; accordingly, disqualification is not warranted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Disqualification Application / Interlocutory Application on Reasonable Apprehension of Bias
- Outcome
- Application for disqualification refused
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'disqualification of Judge' 'interlocutory Applications' 'leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Disqualification Application / Interlocutory Application on Reasonable Apprehension of Bias
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a reasonable apprehension of bias exists by reason of the judge's prior participation in related appeal proceedings" 'Whether the judge should be disqualified from hearing further interlocutory or substantive applications']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the judge arising solely from prior participation in appellate proceedings refusing leave to appeal, where the basis for refusal was the lack of public interest and no adverse finding was made as to the applicants' conduct; accordingly, disqualification is not warranted.
Court Disposition
Application for disqualification refused
Orders
- ['The orders sought by the applicants for disqualification are refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment