Stenhouse v Coleman [1944] HCA 36
The Bread Industry (New South Wales) Order was made under valid authority conferred by regulation 59 of the National Security (General) Regulations pursuant to the National Security Act 1939-1943 and within the defence power of the Constitution. The Order's provisions regulating licensing of bread manufacture and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Myrtle Grove Stenhouse; Respondent: John Joseph Coleman
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Prohibition Application; Criminal Conviction Appeal / Final Determination on Rule Nisi, High Court Following Removal From Supreme Court of NSW
- Outcome
- Rule nisi discharged; prohibition refused.
- Legal Topics
- Defence Power, Ultra Vires, Sub Delegation of Legislative Powers, Validity of Regulations and Orders, Licensing of Bread Industry
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Myrtle Grove Stenhouse
Applicant
John Joseph Coleman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Prohibition Application; Criminal Conviction Appeal / Final Determination on Rule Nisi, High Court Following Removal From Supreme Court of NSW
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bread Industry (New South Wales) Order made under the National Security (General) Regulations is ultra vires the National Security Act 1939-1943 and outside the defence power conferred by s. 51(vi) of the Constitution
- 2 Whether regulation 59 of the National Security (General) Regulations is authorized by the Act and Constitution
- 3 Whether Ministerial discretion under the regulations is examinable by the courts for constitutional validity
Ratio Decidendi
The Bread Industry (New South Wales) Order was made under valid authority conferred by regulation 59 of the National Security (General) Regulations pursuant to the National Security Act 1939-1943 and within the defence power of the Constitution. The Order's provisions regulating licensing of bread manufacture and distribution, and its connection to essential supplies during wartime, possess a real and substantial nexus to the defence power. Ministerial discretion is subject to legal limits and review; neither the regulation nor the Order is ultra vires.
Court Disposition
Rule nisi discharged; prohibition refused.
Orders
- Order nisi for prohibition discharged with costs, including costs in Supreme Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment