MZAGD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 673
The applicant's proposed appeal grounds did not demonstrate any reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdictional error, as they were confined to challenging the Tribunal's credibility and factual findings; thus, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: MZAGD; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Merit Review, Protection Visa
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MZAGD
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to reinstate the applicant's proceeding involved error warranting the grant of leave to appeal
- 2 Whether the applicant's claims indicated a reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdictional error
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's proposed appeal grounds did not demonstrate any reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdictional error, as they were confined to challenging the Tribunal's credibility and factual findings; thus, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the Minister's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment