Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC [2025] HCA 5
Section 198(6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), requiring removal of an unlawful non-citizen as soon as reasonably practicable, does not override the Federal Court’s statutory and incidental power to grant an interlocutory injunction to restrain removal in order to protect the integrity or utility of its own processes, including where proceedings are pending that challenge executive decision-making in relation to non-compellable Ministerial powers. Compliance with a properly granted injunction does not constitute breach of duty under s 198(6).
- Parties
- Appellants: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Ors; Respondent: MZAPC
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Executive Power, Interlocutory Injunction, Jurisdiction of Federal Court, Removal of Unlawful Non Citizen, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Ors
Appellants
MZAPC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court of Australia has power to grant an interlocutory injunction restraining officers from removing an unlawful non-citizen under s 198(6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) pending the determination of proceedings that do not challenge the valid application of that section.
- 2 Whether s 198(6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) accommodates a court-ordered interlocutory injunction, or if it prevents the grant of such relief.
- 3 Whether the meaning of 'as soon as reasonably practicable' in s 198(6) precludes removal where court proceedings challenge administrative decision-making around referrals to the Minister.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 198(6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), requiring removal of an unlawful non-citizen as soon as reasonably practicable, does not override the Federal Court’s statutory and incidental power to grant an interlocutory injunction to restrain removal in order to protect the integrity or utility of its own processes, including where proceedings are pending that challenge executive decision-making in relation to non-compellable Ministerial powers. Compliance with a properly granted injunction does not constitute breach of duty under s 198(6).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment