MZAPC v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 877
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because refusal of an interlocutory injunction to restrain removal does not affect the applicant's liberty within the meaning of s 24(1C) of the Federal Court of Australia Act. The statutory powers for Ministerial intervention are non-compellable and do not create any legal status for requests to be 'pending', nor do they delay or qualify the duty to remove an unlawful non-citizen under s 198(6) of the Migration Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision – Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Injunction' 'ministerial Intervention Powers' 'immigration Detention' 'removal From Australia']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision – Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is leave required to appeal the interlocutory decision?' 'Should leave be granted to appeal the interlocutory decision?' "If leave is granted, should the appeal be allowed – is removal lawful while Ministerial intervention requests are 'pending'?"]
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because refusal of an interlocutory injunction to restrain removal does not affect the applicant's liberty within the meaning of s 24(1C) of the Federal Court of Australia Act. The statutory powers for Ministerial intervention are non-compellable and do not create any legal status for requests to be 'pending', nor do they delay or qualify the duty to remove an unlawful non-citizen under s 198(6) of the Migration Act.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant do pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application including the costs incurred on the basis of the order that any appeal be heard at the same time as the application for leave to appeal; such costs to be assessed by a registrar if...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment