MZART v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 240

MZART v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 240

The application to amend the notice of appeal was refused as the new grounds were without merit, inadequately explained, and already addressed by the Tribunal. The appeal was consequently dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application to Amend Notice of Appeal and on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'amendment of Notice of Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Application to Amend Notice of Appeal and on Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the notice of appeal to include new grounds not raised below' 'Whether the new grounds of appeal had merit' "Whether the Tribunal cumulatively assessed the appellant's claims of persecution" 'Whether there was a jurisdictional error concerning the provision of particulars under s 424A of the Migration Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The application to amend the notice of appeal was refused as the new grounds were without merit, inadequately explained, and already addressed by the Tribunal. The appeal was consequently dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ["The appellant's application to amend the notice of appeal dated 10 February 2017 be refused." 'The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed."]