MZART v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 240
The application to amend the notice of appeal was refused as the new grounds were without merit, inadequately explained, and already addressed by the Tribunal. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Application to Amend Notice of Appeal and on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'amendment of Notice of Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application to Amend Notice of Appeal and on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the notice of appeal to include new grounds not raised below' 'Whether the new grounds of appeal had merit' "Whether the Tribunal cumulatively assessed the appellant's claims of persecution" 'Whether there was a jurisdictional error concerning the provision of particulars under s 424A of the Migration Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to amend the notice of appeal was refused as the new grounds were without merit, inadequately explained, and already addressed by the Tribunal. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The appellant's application to amend the notice of appeal dated 10 February 2017 be refused." 'The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment