MZARX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 437
Leave to rely on proposed grounds 1 and 2 was refused because those grounds were not raised below and had no merit. Ground 3 was dismissed as there was no error by the Tribunal regarding s 424A. The Tribunal considered all relevant issues both individually and cumulatively. The appeal was dismissed and the appellant ordered to pay costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'cumulative Assessment' 'section 424 a Particulars']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Tribunal failed to assess whether brief detention would result in persecution' "Whether appellant's claim was cumulatively assessed" 'Whether Tribunal failed to give particulars as required by s 424A(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether leave should be granted to pursue proposed grounds of appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to rely on proposed grounds 1 and 2 was refused because those grounds were not raised below and had no merit. Ground 3 was dismissed as there was no error by the Tribunal regarding s 424A. The Tribunal considered all relevant issues both individually and cumulatively. The appeal was dismissed and the appellant ordered to pay costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to rely on proposed grounds 1 and 2 in the Notice of Appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the First Respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment