MZZDJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 156
The appellant’s migration agent made a valid oral variation of the address under s 494D(3), requiring notification by email; effective notice was given on 30 July 2012 and the review application was made within the statutory time, granting the Tribunal jurisdiction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['merits Review' 'notification of Decisions' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the decision of the Minister's delegate" 'Whether the application for review was made within time' 'Whether an oral request to send notification by email constituted a variation of the notice of authorised recipient’s address under s 494D(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant’s migration agent made a valid oral variation of the address under s 494D(3), requiring notification by email; effective notice was given on 30 July 2012 and the review application was made within the statutory time, granting the Tribunal jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Declaration that the appellant was notified in accordance with Migration Act 1958 (Cth) on 30 July 2012; Tribunal has jurisdiction.' 'Leave to amend title of first respondent in Notice of Appeal.' 'Orders of Federal Circuit Court made on 28 June 2013 set aside.' 'Order in the nature of certiorari to quash decision...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment