MZZWL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 73
The appeal should be dismissed because the appellant failed to attend the hearing, and in the interests of justice, dismissal is appropriate according to guidance in Al Mamun v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship and relevant statutory power.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment Following Hearing (appellant's Non Appearance)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for want of appearance by appellant. Appellant to pay costs of the first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['dismissal for Want of Appearance' 'judicial Review of Migration Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment Following Hearing (appellant's Non Appearance)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate course when an appellant fails to appear at the hearing of an appeal?']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal should be dismissed because the appellant failed to attend the hearing, and in the interests of justice, dismissal is appropriate according to guidance in Al Mamun v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship and relevant statutory power.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for want of appearance by appellant. Appellant to pay costs of the first respondent.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment