SMITH v WHITTINGTON [1993] NSWCA 248
The trial judge made irreconcilable findings of fact: both that the orthodox method was used (favouring defendants) and that the plaintiff's leg was entangled by the rope (favouring plaintiff). Both derive from credibility findings this court cannot resolve. Accordingly, the judgment cannot stand and a new trial is necessary.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: N Smith; Defendant: T Whittington; Defendant: Sheryl Whittington; Defendant: Peter Frey
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal, Setting Aside Trial Judgment and Ordering New Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment set aside; new trial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Water Skiing Accident, Findings of Fact, Inconsistent Evidence, Standard of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N Smith
Plaintiff
T Whittington
Defendant
Sheryl Whittington
Defendant
Peter Frey
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal, Setting Aside Trial Judgment and Ordering New Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were negligent in failing to ensure the tow rope was taut and visible before commencing the water ski tow
- 2 Whether inconsistent findings of fact at trial vitiated the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge made irreconcilable findings of fact: both that the orthodox method was used (favouring defendants) and that the plaintiff's leg was entangled by the rope (favouring plaintiff). Both derive from credibility findings this court cannot resolve. Accordingly, the judgment cannot stand and a new trial is necessary.
Court Disposition
Judgment set aside; new trial ordered
Orders
- Judgment set aside
- New trial to be had
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment