NACT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1619
The Refugee Review Tribunal's decision of 23 September 1999 was a privative clause decision, the applicant was notified of that decision more than twenty-eight days before commencing the proceeding, and s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) prevented the Federal Court from entertaining the out-of-time application for relief based on alleged denial of procedural fairness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Prerogative Relief in Relation to a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Minister's Motion on Notice Seeking Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'privative Clause Decision' 'time Limit for Federal Court Application' 'procedural Fairness' 'prerogative Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Prerogative Relief in Relation to a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Minister's Motion on Notice Seeking Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceeding seeking prerogative relief in relation to the Refugee Review Tribunal decision of 23 September 1999 was barred by s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the Federal Court could entertain the applicant's procedural fairness challenge when the application was filed more than twenty-eight days after notification of the Tribunal's decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Refugee Review Tribunal's decision of 23 September 1999 was a privative clause decision, the applicant was notified of that decision more than twenty-eight days before commencing the proceeding, and s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) prevented the Federal Court from entertaining the out-of-time application for relief based on alleged denial of procedural fairness.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment