REGINA v. BARAKAT [2004] NSWCCA 201
The sentencing judge did not err in the result, as all relevant subjective and objective factors were considered, and no lesser non-parole period would have been appropriate without being unreasonably disproportionate; leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'drug Offences' 'discounts for Plea and Assistance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in determining the starting point for sentencing before allowing discounts for plea and assistance' "Whether the trial judge erred in concluding he could not have regard to the applicant's cooperation when determining special circumstances for non-parole period" "Whether the trial judge erred in not finding that the applicant's horrific experiences in custody were relevant in reducing sentence" 'Whether the trial judge erred in not finding special circumstances under s.44(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in the result, as all relevant subjective and objective factors were considered, and no lesser non-parole period would have been appropriate without being unreasonably disproportionate; leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['leave to appeal granted' 'appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment