Mohareb v Palmer [2015] NSWCA 369
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant did not identify with precision the false statement allegedly made on oath; without such clear identification, there were no reasonable prospects of success in prosecuting the alleged perjury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Summons Seeking Leave to Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Prosecute for Perjury
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'perjury Prosecution' 'crimes Act 1900 (nsw) S 338(1)(c)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Summons Seeking Leave to Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Prosecute for Perjury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in refusing leave to prosecute for perjury under Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 338(1)(c)' "Whether there was an arguable error in the primary judge's decision to refuse leave for want of precision in the alleged perjured statement"]
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant did not identify with precision the false statement allegedly made on oath; without such clear identification, there were no reasonable prospects of success in prosecuting the alleged perjury.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment