Mohareb v Palmer [2020] NSWCA 323

Mohareb v Palmer [2020] NSWCA 323

The applicant had not established a reasonable apprehension of bias as the presiding judge’s prior involvement in related appeals did not, on the evidence, demonstrate partiality or prejudgment; prior non-dispositive statements and handling of previous proceedings were insufficient to warrant recusal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Recusal Application in Leave to Appeal Proceedings / Recusal Application Decision
Outcome
Recusal application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['recusal' 'reasonable Apprehension of Bias' 'vexatious Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure'] ['recusal' 'reasonable Apprehension of Bias' 'vexatious Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Recusal Application in Leave to Appeal Proceedings / Recusal Application Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether reasonable apprehension of bias justified recusal of presiding judge' 'Proper approach to recusal when presiding judge has previously sat on related matters deemed vexatious']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant had not established a reasonable apprehension of bias as the presiding judge’s prior involvement in related appeals did not, on the evidence, demonstrate partiality or prejudgment; prior non-dispositive statements and handling of previous proceedings were insufficient to warrant recusal.

Court Disposition

Recusal application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Application for recusal is dismissed.']