Mohareb v Palmer [2018] NSWCA 220
Leave to appeal was refused because, although there was error in Lonergan J's reasoning regarding power to set aside Adamson J's orders, there was no basis to set aside the underlying orders, and the error did not result in a miscarriage of justice given the substantive outcome would not change.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Summons Seeking Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'jurisdiction' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Summons Seeking Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from Lonergan J's decision dismissing application to set aside Adamson J's orders" "Whether the Supreme Court had power to set aside Adamson J's orders under UCPR r 36.16(3A)" 'Effect of Federal Court setting aside bankruptcy notice on the Supreme Court proceedings' 'Whether costs should have been awarded in the Local Court']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because, although there was error in Lonergan J's reasoning regarding power to set aside Adamson J's orders, there was no basis to set aside the underlying orders, and the error did not result in a miscarriage of justice given the substantive outcome would not change.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; summons dismissed
Orders
- ['Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed.' 'No order as to costs or disbursements.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment