Kryeziu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1405
The application should be dismissed because the applicant failed to appear and because the grounds of review do not disclose any ground available under s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), being limited to complaints about incorrect factual findings.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nadire Kryeziu; Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Hearing of Application for Review; Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Visa Application Refusal, Special Need Relative Provisions, Summary Dismissal of Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nadire Kryeziu
Applicant
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Hearing of Application for Review; Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant met the criteria for a Family 806 (Residence) (Class AO) visa as a special need relative at the time of application
- 2 Whether the grounds of review disclosed any ground under s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The application should be dismissed because the applicant failed to appear and because the grounds of review do not disclose any ground available under s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), being limited to complaints about incorrect factual findings.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment