NAFF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 723

NAFF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 723

No error of law has been demonstrated in the decision of the primary judge and no reviewable ground justifying an extension of time or judicial review against the RRT decision has been made out; therefore, the application for extension of time is refused.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Migration / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'error of Law' 'judicial Review' 'protection From Domestic Violence']
['migration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'error of Law' 'judicial Review' 'protection From Domestic Violence']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether error of law in primary judge's decision" 'Whether extension of time should be granted']

Ratio Decidendi

No error of law has been demonstrated in the decision of the primary judge and no reviewable ground justifying an extension of time or judicial review against the RRT decision has been made out; therefore, the application for extension of time is refused.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of this application."]