NAID v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 187

NAID v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 187

The appeal had to be dismissed because the appellant identified no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's treatment of the documents or any error in the primary judge's reasons; the grounds sought only to re-agitate findings of fact and credibility that were for the Tribunal and not open to be remade on appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Refusal of a Protection (class Xa) Visa / Full Court Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'credibility Findings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Refusal of a Protection (class Xa) Visa / Full Court Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal made a jurisdictional error by failing to investigate documents submitted by the appellant.' 'Whether the appeal impermissibly sought to re-agitate issues of fact and credibility determined by the Tribunal.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal had to be dismissed because the appellant identified no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's treatment of the documents or any error in the primary judge's reasons; the grounds sought only to re-agitate findings of fact and credibility that were for the Tribunal and not open to be remade on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]