NAJG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1135
The appellant had been given notice of the hearing, did not appear, and no explanation was proffered for his non-appearance; accordingly it was appropriate to dismiss the appeal under Federal Court Rules O 52 r 38A(1)(c).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From a Judgment of a Federal Magistrate Dismissing an Application to Review a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Hearing of Appeal in the Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'non Appearance at Appeal Hearing' 'dismissal of Appeal' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judgment of a Federal Magistrate Dismissing an Application to Review a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Hearing of Appeal in the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed where the appellant was absent when the appeal was called on for hearing.' 'Whether the appellant had been given notice of the hearing and had provided any explanation for non-appearance.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant had been given notice of the hearing, did not appear, and no explanation was proffered for his non-appearance; accordingly it was appropriate to dismiss the appeal under Federal Court Rules O 52 r 38A(1)(c).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment