Nakar Property Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1206
The Court was satisfied, on the basis of the parties' jurisdictional statement and the evidence, that the relevant jurisdictional prerequisites were met and that the agreed decision to grant consent to the amended development application was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the proceedings to be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Deemed Refusal of Development Application No. 24/0055 / Orders Made Following S 34 Conciliation Conferences and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and Development Application No 24/0055, as amended, is determined by the grant of consent subject to conditions; the Applicant is ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of $7,000.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal Appeal' 'natural Gas Powered Electricity Generating Plant' 'conciliation Conference' 'development Consent' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Deemed Refusal of Development Application No. 24/0055 / Orders Made Following S 34 Conciliation Conferences and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreed decision was a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for granting consent to the amended development application were satisfied.' 'Whether Development Application No 24/0055, as amended, should be determined by the grant of consent subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied, on the basis of the parties' jurisdictional statement and the evidence, that the relevant jurisdictional prerequisites were met and that the agreed decision to grant consent to the amended development application was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the proceedings to be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and Development Application No 24/0055, as amended, is determined by the grant of consent subject to conditions; the Applicant is ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of $7,000.
Orders
- ["The Applicant shall pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $7,000 within 14 days of the date of this order." 'The applicant is directed to file the amended development application the subject of Order (4) within 7 days of the date of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment