NAKG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1600
In the absence of a decision from the Full Court overturning Al Masri, the Court should order the applicant's release from immigration detention where the evidence establishes no real prospect of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future, following the construction adopted in Al Masri.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Release From Immigration Detention / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for release of the applicant from immigration detention on conditions, pending the decision of the Full Court in Al Masri.
- Legal Topics
- ['mandatory Immigration Detention' 'statutory Construction' 'judicial Precedent' 'unlawful Non Citizens' 'removal From Australia']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Release From Immigration Detention / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be released from immigration detention where removal in the reasonably foreseeable future is not practicable' 'Whether the decision of Merkel J in Al Masri should be followed']
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of a decision from the Full Court overturning Al Masri, the Court should order the applicant's release from immigration detention where the evidence establishes no real prospect of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future, following the construction adopted in Al Masri.
Court Disposition
Order for release of the applicant from immigration detention on conditions, pending the decision of the Full Court in Al Masri.
Orders
- ['Order for release of the applicant from immigration detention, conditions to be settled upon submissions or agreement.' 'Liberty to apply.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment