REGINA v NAL [2002] NSWCCA 346
The grounds for appeal are not made out and no other sentence is warranted by law, so the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: NAL
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, Aggravated Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Regina
Respondent
NAL
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether ambiguities in sentencing reasons warrant leave to appeal
- 2 whether sentence imposed after conviction was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds for appeal are not made out and no other sentence is warranted by law, so the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment