Manage v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1891
The bridging visa notification did not confer on the appellant a right to make a valid application for a student visa outside the 28-day period prescribed by cl 573.211 of Sch 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth). The appellant did not make a valid application within the relevant statutory period, so the Tribunal made no jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'visa Applications' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal committed a jurisdictional error by not considering if the bridging visa notice granted the appellant a right or ability to apply for a visa.' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant circumstances concerning the criteria for the grant of the visa.']
Ratio Decidendi
The bridging visa notification did not confer on the appellant a right to make a valid application for a student visa outside the 28-day period prescribed by cl 573.211 of Sch 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth). The appellant did not make a valid application within the relevant statutory period, so the Tribunal made no jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, to be fixed by way of a lump sum." "Within 14 days, the parties file any agreed proposed minutes of orders fixing a lump sum in relation to the first respondent's costs." 'If no agreement: within 21 days, the first respondent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment