Bartkus v Bartkus [2010] NSWSC 889

Bartkus v Bartkus [2010] NSWSC 889

The plaintiff was left with adequate provision and the needs of the defendant, who cared for the deceased and lacked assets, outweighed those of the plaintiff; thus, no order was made for provision for the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 August 2010
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Proceedings dismissed; no order for costs
Legal Topics
['family Provision' "testator's Intention" 'competing Needs' 'costs']
['family Law' 'wills and Estates' 'equity'] ['family Provision' "testator's Intention" 'competing Needs' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the deceased failed to make adequate provision for the plaintiff under s 7 of the Family Provision Act 1982' 'Whether an order should be made for provision for the plaintiff' 'Whether the court should depart from the general costs principle']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was left with adequate provision and the needs of the defendant, who cared for the deceased and lacked assets, outweighed those of the plaintiff; thus, no order was made for provision for the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Proceedings dismissed; no order for costs

Orders

  • ['Proceedings dismissed.' 'No order for costs.']