R v Nareg Mouradian [2007] NSWDC 114

R v Nareg Mouradian [2007] NSWDC 114

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was the person who maliciously damaged the cash registers, stole the camera, stole cash, and unlawfully broke out, based on video and circumstantial evidence, rejecting the appellant's account.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
conviction appeals dismissed, convictions confirmed, partial variation of sentences
Legal Topics
['malicious Damage' 'breaking Out After Committing Indictable Offence']
['criminal Law'] ['malicious Damage' 'breaking Out After Committing Indictable Offence']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant maliciously damaged cash registers' 'Whether the appellant broke out having committed a serious indictable offence' 'Whether the appellant stole cash and a CCTV camera']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was the person who maliciously damaged the cash registers, stole the camera, stole cash, and unlawfully broke out, based on video and circumstantial evidence, rejecting the appellant's account.

Court Disposition

conviction appeals dismissed, convictions confirmed, partial variation of sentences

Orders

  • ['Conviction appeals dismissed' 'Convictions confirmed' 'Terms of imprisonment for malicious damage offences (6 months each) confirmed but suspended conditional on good behaviour bonds under s 12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'Sentence of 18 months for breaking out offence quashed, in lieu sentence of 9...