Takhi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2018] FCA 2051
The proposed grounds of appeal failed to identify any arguable legal error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision to dismiss the judicial review application, as neither jurisdictional error nor a denial of procedural fairness was established. The interests of justice do not warrant a grant of leave to appeal where...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal (application for Leave) From Federal Circuit Court Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'visa Refusal' 'procedural Fairness' 'summary Dismissal' 'leave to Appeal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal (application for Leave) From Federal Circuit Court Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proposed grounds of appeal raise an arguable error of law justifying leave to appeal' "Whether the Tribunal failed to apply the correct legal criteria regarding 'genuine temporary entrant' for student visa" 'Whether there was a denial of procedural fairness or bias by the Tribunal or the Federal Circuit Court' 'Whether the primary judge incorrectly applied summary dismissal principles at a show cause hearing']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed grounds of appeal failed to identify any arguable legal error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision to dismiss the judicial review application, as neither jurisdictional error nor a denial of procedural fairness was established. The interests of justice do not warrant a grant of leave to appeal where no reasonable prospects of success are shown.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal the judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia is dismissed.' 'The applicants are to pay the costs of the first respondent as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment