Thacker v Bonham [2017] NSWCATAP 217
Given the contract had not been terminated and the evidence before the primary member did not contradict the making of a work order, the appeal grounds failed; the exercise of discretion under s 48MA to make a work order was within the range of reasonable outcomes; no error of law or substantial miscarriage of justice was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision of Appeal Panel
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['error in Evidence' 'discretion on Remedy' 'works Order' 'work Orders Under S 48 MA Home Building Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision of Appeal Panel
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary member erred in making a work order based on incomplete evidence of the settlement agreement' 'Whether the decision was fair and equitable given the evidence before the Tribunal' 'Whether significant new evidence justified a different outcome on appeal' 'Whether error of law was made for failing to take into account or provide adequate reasons regarding the settlement agreement']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the contract had not been terminated and the evidence before the primary member did not contradict the making of a work order, the appeal grounds failed; the exercise of discretion under s 48MA to make a work order was within the range of reasonable outcomes; no error of law or substantial miscarriage of justice was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Grant extension of time for filing of the appeal to and including 4 August 2017.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' "The stay on orders 2, 4, 5, and 6 made on 6 July 2017 is lifted upon publication of these reasons and order 5 is varied: 'The works are to be completed no later than three months after date of publication...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment