Bertucci v Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) [2021] NSWSC 240
Considering the alleged seriousness and sophistication of the importation, the commercial quantity of methamphetamine, the very strong prosecution case based particularly on material found on the applicant's laptop and devices, the likely sentence if convicted, the likely but not unusual delay before trial, the applicant's family circumstances, and the proposed surety and stringent bail conditions, the applicant did not discharge the onus of showing cause why his detention was not justified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Release Application / Supreme Court Release Application After Unsuccessful Local Court Release Application
- Outcome
- Release application dismissed; bail refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'show Cause Requirement' 'unacceptable Risk' 'drug Importation' 'delay' 'strength of Prosecution Case' 'family Circumstances' 'electronic Monitoring' 'surety']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Release Application / Supreme Court Release Application After Unsuccessful Local Court Release Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant showed cause under s 16B(1)(g) of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) why his detention was not justified.' 'Whether the combination of the circumstantial nature of the prosecution case, likely delay, family circumstances, proposed stringent bail conditions, electronic monitoring and surety justified release on bail.' 'The relevance of the strength of the prosecution case and seriousness of the alleged importation to the show cause assessment.']
Ratio Decidendi
Considering the alleged seriousness and sophistication of the importation, the commercial quantity of methamphetamine, the very strong prosecution case based particularly on material found on the applicant's laptop and devices, the likely sentence if convicted, the likely but not unusual delay before trial, the applicant's family circumstances, and the proposed surety and stringent bail conditions, the applicant did not discharge the onus of showing cause why his detention was not justified.
Court Disposition
Release application dismissed; bail refused.
Orders
- ['The release application is dismissed.' 'Bail is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment