Nathan Elali v Carl Frederik Reinhold Mahrs (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 1363
Clarification of Order 3 is required as to whom enforcement of the costs order may be made against, with guidance from authority that enforcement should not be against the trustee personally but may be against the bankrupt.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Directions Hearing for Clarification of Costs Order
- Outcome
- Proceedings adjourned for further notification and submissions. No final clarification order made at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- ['interpretation of Court Orders' 'costs Orders Against Bankrupts' 'enforcement of Judgment Debts in Bankruptcy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Directions Hearing for Clarification of Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Interpretation of Order 3 regarding enforcement of costs order against bankrupt's trustee" 'Responsibility for satisfaction of costs order made after bankruptcy']
Ratio Decidendi
Clarification of Order 3 is required as to whom enforcement of the costs order may be made against, with guidance from authority that enforcement should not be against the trustee personally but may be against the bankrupt.
Court Disposition
Proceedings adjourned for further notification and submissions. No final clarification order made at this stage.
Orders
- ["Direct the plaintiff's trustee in bankruptcy to serve a copy of these reasons upon Mr Massey, solicitor for Mr Elali by 4pm on Monday 21 September 2015." 'If the trustee in bankruptcy ascertains Mr Massey no longer acts for Mr Elali, direct the trustee in bankruptcy to serve a copy of these reasons by the most...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment