Nathan Elali v Carl Frederik Reinhold Mahrs (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 1363

Nathan Elali v Carl Frederik Reinhold Mahrs (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 1363

Clarification of Order 3 is required as to whom enforcement of the costs order may be made against, with guidance from authority that enforcement should not be against the trustee personally but may be against the bankrupt.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Equity / Directions Hearing for Clarification of Costs Order
Outcome
Proceedings adjourned for further notification and submissions. No final clarification order made at this stage.
Legal Topics
['interpretation of Court Orders' 'costs Orders Against Bankrupts' 'enforcement of Judgment Debts in Bankruptcy']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity / Directions Hearing for Clarification of Costs Order

  1. 1 ["Interpretation of Order 3 regarding enforcement of costs order against bankrupt's trustee" 'Responsibility for satisfaction of costs order made after bankruptcy']

Ratio Decidendi

Clarification of Order 3 is required as to whom enforcement of the costs order may be made against, with guidance from authority that enforcement should not be against the trustee personally but may be against the bankrupt.

Court Disposition

Proceedings adjourned for further notification and submissions. No final clarification order made at this stage.

Orders

  • ["Direct the plaintiff's trustee in bankruptcy to serve a copy of these reasons upon Mr Massey, solicitor for Mr Elali by 4pm on Monday 21 September 2015." 'If the trustee in bankruptcy ascertains Mr Massey no longer acts for Mr Elali, direct the trustee in bankruptcy to serve a copy of these reasons by the most...