National Australia Bank Limited v Octagon Financial Services Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 689

National Australia Bank Limited v Octagon Financial Services Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 689

The plaintiff is granted relief sought as parties have agreed to consent judgment, procedural requirements have been met, and there is no opposition from defendants.

Parties
Plaintiff: National Australia Bank Limited; First Defendant: Octagon Financial Services Pty Limited; Second Defendant: Nicholas Martin Hunter
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Statement of Claim / Final Judgment Consent Orders
Outcome
Consent orders granted in terms of consent judgment.
Legal Topics
Judgments and Orders, Possession of Property, Consent Judgment, Leave to Issue Writ of Possession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Australia Bank Limited

Plaintiff

Octagon Financial Services Pty Limited

First Defendant

Nicholas Martin Hunter

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Statement of Claim / Final Judgment Consent Orders

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to entry of consent judgment for sums outstanding and possession of property
  2. 2 Whether procedural requirements for consent orders are satisfied

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff is granted relief sought as parties have agreed to consent judgment, procedural requirements have been met, and there is no opposition from defendants.

Court Disposition

Consent orders granted in terms of consent judgment.

Orders

  • Judgment in favour of plaintiff for amount outstanding under agreement
  • Order for possession of property at St Ives