Sayed v National Australia Bank Limited (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 140

Sayed v National Australia Bank Limited (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 140

The Court considered the positions communicated between the parties and the respondent's consent (subject to conditions), and judged it appropriate and sufficient to stay the writ of possession for four weeks to allow the applicant to take procedural steps including filing an appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Writ of possession stayed up to and including 21 March 2013.
Legal Topics
['stay of Writ of Possession' 'judgments and Orders']
['civil Procedure'] ['stay of Writ of Possession' 'judgments and Orders']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether to grant a stay of a writ of possession pending appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court considered the positions communicated between the parties and the respondent's consent (subject to conditions), and judged it appropriate and sufficient to stay the writ of possession for four weeks to allow the applicant to take procedural steps including filing an appeal.

Court Disposition

Writ of possession stayed up to and including 21 March 2013.

Orders

  • ['Writ of possession stayed up to and including 21 March 2013.']