National Australia Bank Limited v Zeene [2015] NSWSC 608
Although the draft amended defence is deficient and does not adequately plead the necessary elements, Mrs Dean should be granted a further opportunity to re-plead, given her circumstances and the procedural history. Leave is granted for the third defendant to re-plead within a set period, with directions for further...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: National Australia Bank Limited; 1st Defendant: Peter Elias Zeene; 2nd Defendant: Cherylyn Tonia Zeene (a/k/a Cherylyn Tonia Dean); 3rd Defendant: Eileen Dean
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to File Amended Defence by Third Defendant
- Outcome
- Third defendant granted leave to re-plead
- Legal Topics
- Amended Defence, Leave to Re Plead, Unconscionable Conduct, Mortgage Enforcement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Australia Bank Limited
Plaintiff
Peter Elias Zeene
1st Defendant
Cherylyn Tonia Zeene (a/k/a Cherylyn Tonia Dean)
2nd Defendant
Eileen Dean
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to File Amended Defence by Third Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the third defendant should be granted leave to file an amended defence
- 2 Whether the proposed amended defence discloses an arguable defence concerning unconscionability and unjust contracts
Ratio Decidendi
Although the draft amended defence is deficient and does not adequately plead the necessary elements, Mrs Dean should be granted a further opportunity to re-plead, given her circumstances and the procedural history. Leave is granted for the third defendant to re-plead within a set period, with directions for further compliance and listing for case management.
Court Disposition
Third defendant granted leave to re-plead
Orders
- Third defendant to have a period of about a month to file a further amended defence
- If withdrawal of earlier admission maintained, compliance with UCPR rule 12.6 is required
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment