Defined Properties Investment Pty Ltd ATF The Defined Property Trust No 1 v National Commercial Finance Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 152
Given repeated extensions, indulgences, and agreement by the parties, it would not be in the interests of justice to revisit and vacate prior orders, including signed consent orders; thus, orders are made in accordance with the consent orders dated 19 December 2017.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Summons / Final Orders
- Outcome
- Judgment for possession granted to the defendant; orders made in terms of the consent orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['writ of Possession' 'deed of Forbearance' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders for possession and vacant possession should be made pursuant to consent orders' 'Whether the Deed of Forbearance and consent judgment should be set aside']
Ratio Decidendi
Given repeated extensions, indulgences, and agreement by the parties, it would not be in the interests of justice to revisit and vacate prior orders, including signed consent orders; thus, orders are made in accordance with the consent orders dated 19 December 2017.
Court Disposition
Judgment for possession granted to the defendant; orders made in terms of the consent orders.
Orders
- ['Judgment for possession of the whole of the land.' 'Order that the first and second plaintiffs give vacant possession within 7 days.' 'Defendant granted leave to issue a Writ of Possession to the first plaintiff forthwith.' "First and second plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment