National Road Transport Association Ltd v Road Safety Remuneration Tribunal (No 2) [2016] FCAFC 58
A stay was not necessary to preserve the subject matter of the litigation pending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court; exceptional circumstances justifying a stay were not shown.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay Pending Special Leave to Appeal / Post Judgment (stay Pending Appeal Application to High Court)
- Outcome
- Application for stay rejected
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Orders' 'special Leave Applications' 'exceptional Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay Pending Special Leave to Appeal / Post Judgment (stay Pending Appeal Application to High Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a stay of the order pending special leave to appeal to the High Court should be granted' 'Whether exceptional circumstances exist justifying a stay']
Ratio Decidendi
A stay was not necessary to preserve the subject matter of the litigation pending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court; exceptional circumstances justifying a stay were not shown.
Court Disposition
Application for stay rejected
Orders
- ["The National Road Transport Association's application for a temporary stay of the operation of the order of the Tribunal pending the making of an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia be rejected."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment