Environment Protection Authority v Nationwide Oil Pty Limited [2002] NSWLEC 201
Nationwide Oil Pty Limited was convicted for emitting offensive odours and polluting waters, as proved beyond reasonable doubt by Agreed Statement of Facts and evidence. The offences were serious, caused harm to persons and loss of business, and attracted a penalty reflecting general and individual deterrence, taking into account early guilty plea, co-operation, practical remedial actions, and antecedents. Application of the totality principle resulted in the aggregate penalty being adjusted to avoid excessive punishment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction and fines imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['pollution Control' 'offensive Odour Emission' 'pollution of Waters' 'totality Principle in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Nationwide Oil Pty Limited caused the emission of an offensive odour contrary to s 129(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997' 'Whether Nationwide Oil Pty Limited polluted waters contrary to s 120(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997' 'Application of the totality principle in sentencing for multiple offences']
Ratio Decidendi
Nationwide Oil Pty Limited was convicted for emitting offensive odours and polluting waters, as proved beyond reasonable doubt by Agreed Statement of Facts and evidence. The offences were serious, caused harm to persons and loss of business, and attracted a penalty reflecting general and individual deterrence, taking into account early guilty plea, co-operation, practical remedial actions, and antecedents. Application of the totality principle resulted in the aggregate penalty being adjusted to avoid excessive punishment.
Court Disposition
Conviction and fines imposed
Orders
- ['In matter No. 50064 of 2002 the defendant is convicted of the charge in the summons.' 'The defendant is ordered to pay a fine in the sum of $50,000 in matter No. 50064 of 2002.' "The defendant is ordered to pay the prosecutor's costs in the agreed sum of $7,000 in matter No. 50064 of 2002." 'In matter No. 50053 of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment